Week of 7.3.2011
More columns
written by John:
Your comments about this column are welcome ~ e-mail John at
John Nippolt
Note: Following is a letter written by John Nippolt to the Letters To The Editor section of Honolulu's daily newspaper.
When teachers have to read the paper or watch television to find out where they stand on contract negotiations, something is wrong.
Without informing the Hawaii State Teachers Association (HSTA) a final contract offer from
the Department of Education (DOE) arrived in my mail last Friday. The "last and best" offer is not an offer. Consider why this is
being done.
Teachers need the HSTA. They have fought and won grievances for me and I believe
in that arm of our union. By forcing a 5 percent wage reduction including an increase in payment for medical coverage over the next
two years, without a vote, as their final solution, one regrettable path appears as this unfolds. Teachers were forced to take this
road in April, 2001, after working without a contract for two years. HSTA went on strike and we lost more than we bargained for.
I hate budget cuts and the slashing of funds for education. I am well aware that every state and union in the nation are facing these
same problems. O.K. But what I don't understand is the lack of inclusiveness; non-sharing of data that needs to be presented to all
parties involved before, and not after contracts go into effect. Why are important updates and timely information, always last minute,
from the media? Not the state, not the DOE, not the HSTA.
National economic woes were catastrophic
for all work forces, so much so, then governor Lingle implemented "Furlough Fridays." To reduce state debt by enforcing a schedule
of public school closures, direct orders were issued for teachers to stay away from their classrooms on those days.
A rallying cry
and plea from the community at large went up to end the remainder of school closures. Obviously, teacher commitment to the children
in the state meant buckling down and getting on with educating children, never mind any other issue. But like everyone, teachers do
not want to work for free.
Dark clouds loom again and as the HSTA possibly drifts toward
calling for a strike, here is one teacher who cannot afford that luxury. I will vote against striking, cross picket lines and risk
being forever ostracized by my colleagues. I cannot pay my bills without my salary and I'll be damned before I put my wife and myself
on the brink of homelessness. Believe it, there are many of us here in Hawaii that live paycheck to paycheck.
I knew when I entered
this profession that my salary would not be large. Children's education comes first and better teachers deserve better pay, but there
are no funds available and the cost of living continues to increase while teacher salaries continue to decrease. The DOE can't pay
me a fair wage for my expertise, performance, and success. I'm a highly qualified, certified professional educator who receives no
compensation for extra hours, extra education, knowledge, and life experience as a professional artist that I bring to the classroom.
I
explain to the handful of parents who attend our school's open house night each year why I'm there. Not to serve the governor, the
state legislature, the DOE, the HSTA, or the bureaucrats who run those archaic institutions. Not school administrators or the parents
of my students. I heed their advice, follow their instructions and obey all rules. I'm under the gun to comply with orders from all
these bosses but I don't serve them. I teach so I can serve one group of people. Those people are my students.
So, I know the outcome. Strike or not, I will have to take the pay cut and the increase in my medical co-payments and any other provision
in the state plan. I just think the whole process should be handled better.
The Spectator
founded 2004 by ron cruger
A place for intelligent writers
A place for intelligent readers