Limitations of a Freedom
Your comments about this column are welcome ~ e-mail Laramie at
founded 2004 by ron cruger
A place for intelligent writers
by Laramie Boyd
A place for intelligent readers
We need to keep in mind that the only freedoms the citizens of America have are the ones
the government gives us. We have also learned that they giveth and they taketh away. And often neither our elected representatives
nor the courts are sure how and why the "inalienable rights" usually work or when they might need to be brought "up to date" or redefined.
Just recently, Janet Hasson, publisher of the Journal News, placed an article in her paper
that included the names and addresses of all the gun permit holders in some New York cities, and a map of their locations. This was
clearly a response to the Newtown, Connecticut devastating school attack and a call for tighter gun controls, with questionable legal
authority. In response, Christopher Fountain, a lawyer, posted a blog containing the addresses and phone numbers of the Journal News
staff, clearly a response to the Hasson posting. It was tit for tat. A lot of people feel that neither of these responses were called
for, let alone justified by the 2nd Amendment.
Superior Court justice Louis Brandeis once
talked about transparency in government when he said "If the broad light of day could be let in upon men's actions, it would purify
them as the Sun disinfects." Brandeis championed more access to health, legislative, and government data. The Hasson-Fountain volley
seemed to miss the point of the judge's proclamation as there certainly was no purification in the actions of the publisher and lawyer.
Isn't it lawyers that come to the defense of newspapers when legal issues come up against the news media?
Internet reaction to the privacy issue was swift and to the point. One blogger asked, "Was this an example of enlightened civic dialogue,
or fierce partisanship involving possible public endangerment?" The postings were both obviously intentional provocation. Another
said "Transparency lends itself to a tool of democracy and a partisan weapon."
and addresses of people on public assistance be posted so we know where some of our tax dollars are going? Would this be another example
of invasion of privacy? Publishers and the media have been known to give out information, in the guise of the public's right to know,
that has ruined lives. Most people feel that the media should report the news, not create it. Too often they seem to be searching
for ways to keep a story going just to increase circulation. The media loves disasters. "Listen to the glee in their voices when they
report on fires, floods, killings, and wars", one blogger wrote.
"If someone knows you
have an expensive coin collection, should their name and address be posted as public information?" And "If known gun owners are listed,
couldn't thieves simply avoid these homes and target the gun-free homes with no fear of being shot at?"
Arguments are always included that guns kill, people don't. Alcohol kills. Drugs kill. Cars kill. Cain killed Abel and didn't use
a gun. Should all devices that are potential killers be outlawed? Should people with a mental illness be included in postings? Surely
the Newtown killer was psychologically unbalanced, as were others who were responsible for recent mass murders. If the names of potentially
dangerous people were made public, what might have been avoided, and how?
But every gun
owner is not a potential killer, even though one blogger proposed that statistically a gun owner is more likely to kill himself or
someone else. "And the NRA", one anti-gun citizen suggested, "is in the business of killing, to end life in some form." A final thought
on the subject: humans are the only animals who destroy their own habitat. It doesn't appear too likely that the gun-ownership controversy
will go away soon. And we will all suffer for it, both pro- and anti-gun zealots. Can't someone rise up and find a workable solution
that is not tainted with political rhetoric and self interest? We need someone like that soon.