>
Guns and Taxes
Your comments about this column are welcome ~ e-mail Laramie at
The Spectator
founded 2004 by ron cruger
A place for intelligent writers
A place for intelligent readers
 by Laramie Boyd
ecrboyd@aol.com
2014 Spectator Ron - The Spectator All Rights Reserved
C
        I can say without hesitation that I am in favor of gun control. The only questions remaining, obviously, should be 1) What guns are we talking about and who can or can't have them, and 2) Who is in charge of controlling ownership and/or use of the guns? And this 2nd question relates to how enforcement of the control is carried out. In other words, if a citizen, or any number of classifications of non-citizens, who is banned from having a gun has one, what happens to that person? It must be made very clear as to how enforcement is applied. These days there seems to be a lack of understanding of the concept that a law without enforcement is not a law at all. It is merely a suggestion or recommendation, with no teeth to encourage compliance. 
        Case in point: An article by Brad Heath in "USA Today", at first reading, seems almost unbelievable. Fugitives, felons and the mentally ill are prohibited from purchasing guns. Yet, Police departments across America fail to enter many of the names of these people into a computer base that identifies those barred from gun ownership. The FBI reports that about 2.5 million names of people on an arrest warrant, felons, and criminals on the lam, are left off the list. In Michigan, the police report only 7% of those belonging on the FBI files, and this kind of disregard is prevalent across the country.
        Is this the kind of gun control the placard carrying and shouting paraders want?

        Are you tired of reading about the super rich getting away without paying their fair share of income tax. Catch this. Gregory Korte, also of "USA Today," discovered that the IRS gave bonuses amounting to almost $3 million to employees who didn't pay their taxes. Other employees also were given 10,500 hours of paid time off, and some even got step increases to higher salaries. The answer given by the IRS? "We will strive to implement a policy that protects the integrity of the tax system." That's reassuring, isn't it? The IRS says over 300,000 federal employees were tax delinquent during one year, which added up to $3.5 billion. No wonder the IRS doggedly chases after the guy who owes them fifty bucks. I guess they need it to make up for the taxes they themselves aren't paying.
        And our taxes go up and up. But maybe, just maybe, the average citizen can start holding off on divvying up. After all, no one of the powers that be seems to care. Has anyone heard of even a committee being formed to address this problem? We all need to pay our fair share. Else how can we keep giving billions of dollars to countries that don't even say thank you? But, as Herman Wouk said, let's "Don't Stop the Carnival."